On the issue of how to ethically motivate prisoners to volunteer for clinical trails on the efficacy of salt-restricted diets, why not offer wages to the prisoners? Prisoners are already sometimes paid small amounts for other activities, like making license plates. Better yet, take my suggestion with a grain of salt, and settle the dispute with well-done observational studies.
(p. D3) Suppose you wanted to do a study of diet and nutrition, with thousands of participants randomly assigned to follow one meal plan or another for years as their health was monitored?
In the real world, studies like these are nearly impossible. That’s why there remain so many unanswered questions about what’s best for people to eat. And one of the biggest of those mysteries concerns salt and its relationship to health.
But now a group of eminent researchers, including the former head of the Food and Drug Administration, has suggested a way to resolve science’s so-called salt wars. They want to conduct an immense trial of salt intake with incarcerated inmates, whose diets could be tightly controlled.
The researchers, who recently proposed the idea in the journal Hypertension, say they are not only completely serious — they are optimistic it will happen.
. . .
Dr. Daniel W. Jones, a professor of medicine and physiology at the University of Mississippi School of Medicine and former president of the American Heart Association, was alarmed by the bitter arguments and increasingly personal disputes between researchers who disagree about salt.
So he invited senior medical scientists on both sides of the debate to meet in Jackson, Miss., to figure out how to settle their differences.
. . .
So suppose you do the study in prisons, said Dr. Jones. Is the research supposed to benefit the prisoners or just the population in general? If the prisoners would not benefit, the study would be unethical.
People who are not incarcerated can choose how much sodium they consume, but prisoners cannot — they eat whatever the facility provides. If there is uncertainty about the ideal amount of sodium, the experts concluded, prisoners would benefit from a study that settled the matter.
. . .
Dr. Macklin, in a telephone interview, also said many prisoners would be happy to jump in. She has taught in a maximum security facility and has studied the ethics of doing research in prisons.
“They would say they want to give back to society,” Dr. Macklin said.
. . .
Prison administrators have told Dr. Jones they would be willing to consider a proposal for a randomized trial of salt.
For the full story see:
(Note: ellipses added.)
(Note: the online version of the story has the date June 4, 2018 [sic], and has the title “The Ideal Subjects for a Salt Study? Maybe Prisoners.”)
The academic article co-authored by Dr. Jones that proposes a randomized double-blind clinical trial (RCT) in prisons is: